[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Magnetic quenched gaps




From: 	gweaver[SMTP:gweaver-at-earthlink-dot-net]
Sent: 	Wednesday, September 17, 1997 11:45 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Magnetic quenched gaps

I don't know anything about magnetic quenching gaps.  Last spring there were
a few posts about this but no details.  I might be willing to experement
with this if I could learn something about it first.

What are the advantages and disadvantages over other gap systems?

Gary Weaver






















At 11:54 PM 9/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>From: 	Alfred A. Skrocki[SMTP:alfred.skrocki-at-cybernetworking-dot-com]
>Sent: 	Wednesday, September 17, 1997 8:54 AM
>To: 	Tesla List
>Subject: 	Re: Magnetic quenched gaps
>
>On Tuesday, September 16, 1997 6:32 PM Dale F. Pfaffle
>[SMTP:pfaffle-at-tele-net-dot-net] wrote;
>
>> Being new here this may have been discussed before but, I have not seen
>> anyone mention quenching with a magnetic field.  Are they not very good, to
>> hard to tune/maintain, or the other methods are just better.
>> Thanks,
>
>
>Incredible! I was honestly just thinking of opening up the subject of 
>magnetic quenching, while reading todays messages, and here you 
>went and beat me to the punch! I suspect we hear so little about 
>magnetic quenching because it is not as well understood as the less
>subtle rotary gaps or stationary gaps with a fan. I don't know if 
>anyone has ever done any serious work to compare a magnetically 
>quenched gap to a fan quenched stationary gap or a rotary. I always 
>liked the subtlety of the magnetically quenched gap though. I was 
>going to ask if anyone out there is currently playing with magnetic 
>quenching.
>
>			       Sincerely
>
>                                \\\|///
>			      \\  ~ ~  //
>                               (  -at- -at-  )
>                        -----o00o-(_)-o00o-----
>                           Alfred A. Skrocki
>                   Alfred.Skrocki-at-CyberNetworking-dot-com
>                             .ooo0   0ooo.
>                        -----(   )---(   )-----
>                              \ (     ) /
>                               \_)   (_/
>
>
>
>
>