[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TC Electrosattics Revisited II




From: 	John H. Couture[SMTP:couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net]
Sent: 	Thursday, September 11, 1997 3:33 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: TC Electrosattics Revisited II

At 12:02 AM 9/11/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>From: 	Richard Wayne Wall[SMTP:rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com]
>Sent: 	Wednesday, September 10, 1997 1:27 PM
>To: 	tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
>Subject: 	TC Electrosattics Revisited II
>
>>From hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com Thu Dec  5 00:16:18 1996
>Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 23:58:26 -0800
>From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
>To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject: Re: TC Electrostatics
>
 ----------------------------------------------------- snip
>>
>One coulomb of electrostatic charge has the potential for vastly more 
>effective work than one ampere flowing in a circuit.  The electrostatic 
>unit concerns itself with scalar potential or voltage, while the other 
>value links the coulomb to current in metallic circuits only with no 
>voltage equivalence.
>
>Richard Hull, TCBOR
>
>------------------------------------------------------

  Richard H. -

  Are you kidding or do you have a problem with standard electrical
engineering or physics terminology? Let's not setup a special terminology
for the "Tesla List". 
  
  Understanding the postings is difficult enough now.

  What fundamental electrical work equations are you referring to?

   John Couture