Re: TC Electrosattics Revisited II

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: TC Electrosattics Revisited II
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:50:31 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Richard Wayne Wall[SMTP:rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com]
Sent: 	Thursday, September 11, 1997 6:59 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: TC Electrosattics Revisited II


GL wrote: 

snip

>Compare the energy stored in a 10 Farad capcitor with 1 coulomb of 
>charge, vs. the energy stored in a 10 Henry inductor with 1 Ampere of 
>current. From the above equations:
>
>Ecap = 0.05 Joules.
>Eind = 5.00 Joules.

snip

I don't understand what the above significance is about.  At first 
blush you seem to provide proof of point for our assertions.  Shouldn't 
both devices store the same energy?  In your example, the inductor (an 
electrodynamic device) has has 100 X the energy of the capacitor (an 
electrostatic device).  This appears to be a two order of magnitude 
inflation of energy of the electromagnetic device over the 
electrostatic device.  Could it possibly be error traced back to the 
faulty experiment purporting to unify EM and ES coulombically?


RWW

• Prev: New testing, more
• Next: FW: To Kevin
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread