[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Corum's Resonator Theory




From: 	richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: 	Friday, October 31, 1997 10:09 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Corum's Resonator Theory

snip

>     Also, I didn't say so in that post but there is also the 
>suggestion from C&C that the two frequencies present in the system 
>coalesce into Fr when the primary lets go of the resonator. I don't 
>buy that either. While one sees two frequencies in the frequency 
>domain, one quite clearly sees the time varying voltage waxing and 
>waning at Fr as pri-sec transfers proceed. Personally I am quite 
>happy with what the scope shows happening in the time domain as 
>regards secondary frequency and amplitude. Absence of evidence of 
>coherence to me suggests the secondary already is coherent as Bert 
>has suggested.
>
>Thanks for the thoughts. Any more or anyone else, please post. I am 
>not out to put C&C down. I just want to understand this thing.
>
>Regards,
>Malcolm
>
>
If we grant the Corums their wishes  (No top load and no spark issuing)  we
don't have OUR Tesla coil anymore.  We have their's and it is a radiator by
the granting of their wishes.....Not a sparker.

Richard Hull, TCBOR