[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Top Terminal Shape



Subject:  Re: Top Terminal Shape
  Date:  Wed, 21 May 1997 14:24:36 -0500
  From:  "Robert W. Stephens" <rwstephens-at-headwaters-dot-com>
    To:  Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>


> Date:          Tue, 20 May 1997 01:50:34 -0500
> To:            tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject:       Re: Top Terminal Shape
> From:          Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>

> Subject:  Re: Top Terminal Shape
>   Date:  Mon, 19 May 1997 22:46:30 +0500
>   From:  "Alfred A. Skrocki" <alfred.skrocki-at-cybernetworking-dot-com>
>     To:  Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> 
> 
> On Sun, 18 May 1997 21:21:20 -0500 Robert W. Stephens
> <rwstephens-at-headwaters-dot-com> wrote;
> 
> > Richard,
> > 
> > A K of 0.62, wow!  Interesting that you are getting magnetic coupling 
> > from the primary to your toroid, this system is indeed tight.  I look 
> > forward to hearing of your progress.
> > 
> > Oh, BTW, employing any form of braided conductor as a coil is illegal 
> > don't you know.
> 
> Robert, could you illucidate on that last line?

> 
> 
Alfred, All,

Quite some time ago there was a list discussion about how various 
types of flat strap, tubing, solid wire, twisted multi-strand wire,
straight 
multi-strand wire, and braided wire (like the outside jacket of coax 
or the flattened braided strap), all compared to each other.  Richard 
Quick and Malcolm Watts in particular gave an enormous 'thumbs down'
on the use of braided conductors in our RF application of primary 
coils and ground runs.  Seems the electricity has to hop 
between all those little wires while doing the skin effect dance.  
The braid is not laboratory clean and there is some junction loss at 
each connection.

My usage of the term 'illegal' was merely tounge-in-cheek.

rwstephens