[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: earth resonance
Tesla List wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: earth resonance
>
> >From hullr-at-whitlock-dot-comThu Sep 5 22:03:38 1996
> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 1996 11:08:35 -0700
> From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: earth resonance
>
> Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > >From ed-at-alumni.caltech.eduWed Sep 4 22:32:22 1996
> > Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 19:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: "Edward V. Phillips" <ed-at-alumni.caltech.edu>
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: earth resonance
> >
> > "Which laws of physics would be violated upon producing an
> > 8/16 hz wave?
> > "
> > Resonance of a coil of the size he could build at
> > Wardenclyfe (sp?) and load with the big structure on top
> > of his tower. IF one could build a suitable resonator and
> > excite it with enough power, one night get something going
> > in the way of exciting the earth as a spherical resonator,
> > but those are mighty big if's.
> >
> > Tesla clearly knew how to design a resonating system,
> > as the calculations in his CSN show. Has anyone ever found
> > any of his calculations directed toward designing such a low
> > frequency system?
> > Ed Phillips
>
> Ed,
>
> That an absolute NO! Tesla had plans for Wardenclyffe to be in the 20KHZ
> range. This was the frequency range he opted for best transmission of
> power. Again, the Corum tell of how the real power launch at the low
> frequencies specified 6-8 Hz are to be created. The ultra high
> power 30khz and below signal in the cavity was to be phased so that as
> the energy in the cavity rose is successive trips within the cavity it
> would form powerful beats at the 6-8HZ range. Tesla notes that the low
> frequency of his system (20KHZ) was needed to provide a low loss power
> input to excite the cavity. He further notes that above 30Khz too much
> energy is loss in the "medium". This is all theoretically possible and
> the Corums note that a good 2KW amateur transmitter re-tuned to this low
> range and phased right "might prove the efficacy of this concept. (see
> their Symposia papers for more detailed specifics) I have never heard of
> them or anyone else doing this though. Lotsa' ifs and maybes.
> Personally, I am currently not very interested in the subject either.
> Other fish to fry, you know.
>
> Richard Hull, TCBOR
Regarding 'frying' -
Was that actual fish, or more Tesla coils????
- Brent ;-)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-