[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: What efficiency?!
Tesla List wrote:
>
> >> Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >> >Subject: What efficiency?!
> >Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >> Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >> >Subject: What efficiency?!
>
> >From couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-netTue Nov 5 22:55:19 1996
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 01:38:26 +0000
> From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
>
> At 05:25 AM 11/5/96 +0000, you wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >> >Subject: What efficiency?!
> >
> >From hullr-at-whitlock-dot-comMon Nov 4 21:47:50 1996
> >Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 17:06:40 -0800
> >From: Richard Hull <hullr-at-whitlock-dot-com>
> >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >
> >Tesla List wrote:
> >>
> >> >From couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-netSun Nov 3 21:31:39 1996
> >> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 06:20:07 +0000
> >> From: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
> >> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >> Subject: Re: What efficiency?!
> >>
>
> Richard -
>
> I show how I measured the overall efficiency of one of my coils in the
> T.C.C.Guide. The efficiency was 56% and agreed closely with the JHCTES
> program and the efficiency graph that I show in the Tesla Coil Notebook.
> Some day you may want to review this information and maybe even try the test.
>
> To have a test, computer program, and graph agree so closely is ,I believe,
> a step foward in the right direction for Tesla coil engineering. I admit a
> lot more testing and work is required to make these three completely
> independent sources of data agree more accurately with real world coils.
> Hopefully coilers in the future will spend more time and effort on this part
> of coiling.
>
> Jack C.
I agree on all the above points. Any positive effort is always better
than nothing or conjecture.
Richard Hull, TCBOR